In this section we calculate the magnetic and electric fields inside and above a uniform Earth.
We consider plane electromagnetic waves as they are typically used in Magnetotellurics (MT).
The conducting Earth is confined to the halfspace in \(z \ge 0\), whereas the Air halfspace is in \(z < 0\). The electrical conductivity \(\sigma\) of the conducting halfspace is uniform. We use time-harmonic plane waves with a time dependency of \(\exp(i \omega t)\).
The source of electromagnetic induction in the lower halfspace is a homogeneous time-harmonic magnetic field in \(z<0\) with \[
\mathbf H(z, \omega) = \begin{bmatrix} H_x\\ 0\\ 0 \end{bmatrix} e^{i \omega t}, \quad z < 0
\tag{6.1}\]
where the amplitude is \(H_x = 1\) A/m. The inducing field is linear polarized in the \(x\)-direction.
Note
In the following, we drop the term \(e^{i \omega t}\).
What do we know about the magnetic field inside the Earth?
In \(z \ge 0\), the magnetic field is a solution of the Helmholtz equation
which results in a \(y\)-component of the associated electric field \(\mathbf E\). The EM waves \(\mathbf H\) and \(\mathbf E\) are transversal waves, hence mutually orthogonal to the direction of propagation \(\mathbf k\), such that
\[
\mathbf H \perp \mathbf E \perp \mathbf k.
\]
Now we derive an expression for \(E_y\) in \(z \ge 0\):
\[
E_y(z) = \frac{1}{\sigma} \partial_z H_x(z) = \frac{ 1 }{ \sigma } \partial_z e^{-i k z} = -\frac{ ik }{ \sigma } e^{-i k z} .
\]
The amplitude of the electric field at the surface of the Earth in \(z=0\) is
We see, that to obtain \(E_y\), we have to integrate both sides of
\[
i \omega \mu = \partial_z E_y.
\] We integrate by parts and get
\[
\int\limits_0^\xi \partial_z E_y \, \mathrm d z = \left[ E_y \right]_0^\xi = [i \omega \mu]_0^\xi
\] Therefore,
\[
E_y(\xi) = E_y(0) + i \omega \mu \xi = -\frac{ \omega\mu_0 }{ k } + i \omega \mu \xi =
-\frac{ \omega \mu_0 }{ k } (1 - i k \xi).
\]
Finally, we obtain the result
\[
E_y(z) =
\begin{cases}
-\dfrac{ \omega\mu_0 }{ k } (1 - i k z) & z \le 0 \\
-\dfrac{ \omega\mu_0 }{ k } e^{-i k z} & z \ge 0
\end{cases}
\]
Self study
Obtain the appropriate expression for \(E_x(z)\) when \(\vb{H} = [0, 1, 0]^\top\)!
Do you observe a difference? Try to explain your result.
6.1 Visualization
We illustrate our results with a simple example of a uniform halfspace with a conductivity of 0.01 S/m and a frequency of 10 Hz.
Shown are real (Re) and imaginary (Im) part of the fields along with their magnitude (Abs) as a function of depth.
Clearly visible is the exponential decay with depth.
Show the code
import matplotlib.pyplot as pltimport numpy as npf =10omega =2* np.pi * fsigma =0.01z = np.arange(-1000, 10001, 100)def h(omega, sigma, z): k = np.sqrt(-1j* omega * np.pi *4e-7* sigma)if z <0: H =1+1j*0if z >=0: H = np.exp(-1j* k * z)return Hdef e(omega, sigma, z): k = np.sqrt(-1j* omega * np.pi *4e-7* sigma)if z <0: E =-1j* k / sigma * (1-1j* k * z)if z >=0: E =-1j* k / sigma * np.exp(-1j* k * z)return EH = [h(omega, sigma, zz) for zz in z]E = [e(omega, sigma, zz) for zz in z]H0 = h(omega, sigma, 0.0)E0 = e(omega, sigma, 0.0)
In our example, the skin depth is np.float64(1590.63) m.
\[
Z(\omega) = \frac{ \mathbf e_h \cdot \mathbf E }{(\mathbf e_h \times \mathbf e_z) \cdot \mathbf H } = \frac{ E_x }{ H_y} = -\frac{ E_y }{H_x }
\] where \(\mathbf e_h\) is an arbitrary horizontal Cartesian unit vector, and \(\mathbf e_z\) is the vertical Cartesian unit vector.
On the surface of a halfspace, we can measure the surface impedance
\[
Z_s = Z(\omega),
\] which in case of a uniform halfspace is identical to the intrinsic impedance
\[
Z_1 = \frac{ \omega \mu_0 }{ k_1 } = Z_s.
\] Here, \(k_1^2 = -i\omega\mu_0\sigma_1\) is the wave propagation constant of the first (however infinite in its vertical extent) layer.
From \(Z_s\) we can infer the apparent resistivity
In the inhomogeneous case, i.e., when the conductivity of the halfspace is not uniform, the apparent resistivity and phase generally vary with frequency.
This can be visualized using sounding curves of \(\rho_a\) vs. period \(T = 1/f\) or \(\varphi\) vs. \(T\).